Free tool

Burn multiple calculator

Burn multiple is how much a company burns to add one euro of net new ARR. It is calculated as net burn divided by net new ARR over the same period, so a multiple of 1.5 means €1.50 of net burn for every €1 of new recurring revenue. Lower is better. This calculator also shows what churn costs you on identical spending. Nothing stored.

Cash
ARR movements
Burn multiple
1.5x
great
Net new ARR
€80,000
for the period
Cost per €1 of ARR
€1.50
burned per recurring euro
Without churn
1.0x
if you retained everything
Burn multipleVerdict
Under 1xExceptional, growth funds itself
1x to 1.5xGreat ← you
1.5x to 2xGood
2x to 3xSuspect, the model needs a story
Over 3xTrouble at any stage past seed

Great: you pay €1.50 for each euro of recurring revenue, and efficient at any stage. Losing nothing this period would have put you at 1.0x on identical spending, which is the whole argument for treating efficiency as a retention problem first.

Track cash, burn and runway live in Plainhub.Build your modelTry the live demo

How this calculator works

Burn multiple is net burn divided by net new ARR over the same period, usually a quarter, so it shows how many euros you burn for each euro of recurring revenue you add. Lower is better. The part people get wrong is the denominator: net new ARR is new plus expansion minus churned and contraction ARR, so churn raises the multiple.

One division, over a period, usually a quarter. David Sacks introduced the metric in The Burn Multiple, an April 2020 essay at Craft Ventures that defines it as net burn divided by net new ARR:

net new ARR    = new + expansion - churned - contraction
net burn       = total spend - cash revenue
burn multiple  = net burn / net new ARR

A company that burns €300,000 in a quarter while adding €200,000 of net new ARR has a burn multiple of 1.5: it pays €1.50 for each recurring euro. Lower is better, because the euro of ARR keeps arriving every year while the €1.50 is gone once.

Churn is the hidden driver, and it is why this calculator asks for the movements separately rather than one net figure. Because the denominator is net new ARR, losing a customer costs you twice: once to acquire them, and again when their ARR leaves. That is why efficiency conversations so often turn out to be retention conversations, and why revenue concentration deserves watching before one account can move the number alone.

The quotable one-line definition sits in the burn multiple glossary entry; the full breakdown, with a worked quarter and the two levers that actually move it, is in the burn multiple guide. Two neighbouring ratios answer adjacent questions: the SaaS magic number judges the sales and marketing spend alone, and the Rule of 40 sums growth and margin for the whole company.

Common questions

What is the burn multiple formula?

Burn multiple = net burn / net new ARR, both measured over the same period, usually a quarter or a year. Net burn is spending minus cash revenue. Net new ARR is new plus expansion, minus churn and contraction.

What is a good burn multiple?

Under 1x is exceptional and means growth largely funds itself. 1x to 1.5x is great, 1.5x to 2x is good, 2x to 3x is suspect and needs a story, and above 3x is trouble at any stage past seed. Benchmarks loosen at seed and in downturns.

Why does churn hurt the burn multiple twice?

Because the denominator is net new ARR. You spend to win the customer, then lose the ARR they carried, so the same burn produces a smaller number underneath it. A company adding 100k of new ARR while churning 40k posts 60k net new, which can nearly double the multiple on identical spending.

Who created the burn multiple?

David Sacks of Craft Ventures introduced it in an April 2020 essay. It caught on because it compresses product, sales, pricing and retention into one ratio and answers a single question: what does a euro of growth cost you?

What if my net new ARR is zero or negative?

Then the burn multiple has no meaningful value, and a calculator that prints one is lying to you. Churn cancelled out everything you added, so any spending at all bought no recurring revenue. Review new sales, expansion, retention and spending to understand why net new ARR is not positive.

How is burn multiple different from CAC payback?

CAC payback measures the sales and marketing cost of one customer. Burn multiple measures the whole company's cash against all the recurring revenue it added, so it catches inefficiency anywhere, including engineering spend that never turned into product anyone paid for.

A derived number is only as current as its inputs

Bring net cash burn and ARR changes for the same period to this calculator. Plainhub tracks current monthly net burn and MRR from your entries. It does not store a quarterly burn total or MRR history, so retain period records before calculating the multiple.